A court will pierce the corporate veil when it finds that the corporation is an agent of its shareholder, and willhold the principal vicariously liable, due to the respondeat superior doctrine. The creditor must show that he or she detrimentally relied on the shareholders fraudulent representation that the corporation was adequately financed at the time the creditor provided the service or goods. exception to that general rule. Outside of bankruptcy (and sometimes in the context of bankruptcy proceedings as well), the goal of eliminating opportunism by companies in financial distress is accomplished by disregarding the corporate form. Puerto Madryn, ciudad cercana al Doradillo, cuenta con playa, paradores, y muchos servicios para disfrutar (buceo - windsurf - hotelera - restaurantes - cruceros). By Edward T. Kang | June 20, 2019 at 01:44 PM. 2019). to you even if the information you submit to us could be used against you in that matter. No. 600 Indeed, California courts recognize that "[a]lter ego is an are mere proxies for one of the three core reasons for piercing described above. Before discussing the most important factors of veil piercing, it is important to understand what it means to pierce the corporate veil. The materials contained within this website provide general information about the Trembly Law Firm, do not constitute legal advice and are intended for informational purposes only. Beaumont, TX 77706 Renewed attention to the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil has arisen because of As most professionals in the legal and insurance fields are aware, the law permits a business to incorporate for the purpose of permitting the business owner to escape personal liability as long as there is no co-mingling of funds and/or the privilege of the separation is not abused so as to permit thepiercing of the corporate veil. meritless affirmative defenses that are "nothing but bare bones conclusory allegations." Id. And it is the first to present a taxonomy that can explain all of the decisions in this area, and that can be used methodologically to evaluate the quality of piercing decisions. 2.5 5] A company formed for fraud or improper conduct or to defeat the law. But if your business is an LLC, you are cautioned to follow normal corporate formalities such as holding regular meetings, maintaining records, issuing reports, and keeping separate accounts, all while not using the LLC as your own personal bank. The author extends special thanks to Sarah Dotzel, who assisted in preparing this article. While piercing the corporate veil is difficult regardless of the timing, knowing the strategic advantages of veil piercing at the pre-judgment stage versus the post-judgment stage could increase a plaintiffs probability of collecting its judgment. Perhaps searching will help. 2d 1053, 1055 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (citations omitted). Piercing the veil of limited liability is an equitable doctrine that is not, by itself, a cause of action. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. Many of us have heard of the term alter ego. For example, Supermans alter ego is mild-mannered reporter Clark Kent. Is there a nexus (i.e., connection) between the domination of the corporation and the injustice that led to the alleged injury? For example, the courts will look to determine whether the owner has so completely dominated the business and used the corporation as an instrument to further the owners own personal business. 1986). When a corporation does not fulfill its state obligations, a court may pierce the corporate veil in order to attach personal liability. We demonstrate that our theory consistently explains the results in the leading cases on piercing the veil. Users of this site should contact a licensed Texas attorney for a full and complete review of their legal issues. West Bend Office/Mailing Address: For example, veil piercing may be done where the corporation is the mere alter-ego of its shareholders, where the corporation is undercapitalized, where there is a failure to observe corporate formalities, where the corporate form is used to promote fraud, injustice or illegalities. Further, agents of a corporation face personal liability if they fail to disclose that they are acting on behalf of a corporation or the business corporate status unless that person knows that the agent is acting as such. Marcados en el mapa con un crculo rojo para su mejor identificacin. We show that the three goals we have identified are a superior predictor of actual veil-piercing decisions than the largely incoherent doctrines espoused by the courts. Suite 101Tampa, FL 33635 For various reasons, a corporations limited liability shield for its shareholders is one of the corporations most valuable assets. Telephone: 713-255-4422 offices throughout the United States and around the World. In July 2019, a division of the Colorado Court of Appeals in Sedgwick Properties Development Corp. v. Hinds issued a very helpful analysis of an attempt to pierce the corporate veil of a single-member LLC. Fax: 210-801-9661 (a) A holder of shares, an owner of any beneficial interest in shares, or a subscriber for shares whose subscription has been accepted, or any affiliate of such a holder, owner, or subscriber or of the corporation, may not be held liable to the corporation or its obligees with respect to: (1) the shares, other than the obligation to pay to the corporation the full amount of consideration, fixed in compliance with Sections 21.157-21.162, for which the shares were or are to be issued; (2) any contractual obligation of the corporation or any matter relating to or arising from the obligation on the basis that the holder, beneficial owner, subscriber, or affiliate is or was the alter ego of the corporation or on the basis of actual or constructive fraud, a sham to perpetrate a fraud, or other similar theory; or. Despite previously held notions that a corporation shields its officers, shareholders, stockholders, and other affiliates from liability, Branscum and Byboth, the officers guilty of fraud against Castleberry, were held personally liable for a promissory note made by the corporate entity. In such a situation, the creditor may also be precluded . Bankruptcy courts firmly respect this shield where a trustee or a judgment creditor attempts veil piercing in bankruptcy pursuant to state law. THIRTEENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE 143 S. Main Street, Third Floor 17330 Preston Rd., Ste. Jarrod Melson. In general this misconduct may include abusing the corporation (e.g. . You should consult with an attorney to review the current status of the law and how it applies to your unique circumstances before deciding to takeor refrain from takingany action. (3) any obligation of the corporation on the basis of the failure of the corporation to observe any corporate formality, including the failure to: (A) comply with this code or the certificate of formation or bylaws of the corporation; or. The court found that the subsidiary was just an instrument of . Piercing the Corporate Veil A short discussion cannot do justice to the developments in the area of corporate veil piercing in Texas over the last 30 years; however, a brief summary is provided below. "Piercing" the corporate veil refers to . Dietel v. Day, 492 P.2d 455 (Ariz. 1972). Requirements include following state laws, filing the proper paperwork, and paying the proper fees. In such a situation, the creditor may also be precluded from piercing the corporate veil under the doctrine of estoppel. Generally speaking, the plaintiff seeking damages must prove that the corporation is indeed influenced by a certain person or persons, that any separation of this person or persons and the corporation never truly existed (other than on paper), and that under the current . This may occur where an incorporator sets up subsidiaries of a parent company simply to avoid attaching the property from the parent company. Lotes lindantes ubicados entre las calles 10 y 11. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Chapter 7. Despite this familiarity, the practical utility of the alter ego doc-trine in litigation actually is widely misunderstood and overesti-mated. Texas courts continue to grapple with how best to define and pursue this type of fraud, and the laws continue to evolve as result of those efforts. 1500 Market Street, Suite 4100Philadelphia, PA 19102 The veil may need to be pierced in this circumstance. Entering into a contract that the LLC doesn't have the means to fulfill. Prong One: Alter Ego/Mere Instrumentality. See, Itel Containers Int'l Corp. v. Atlanttrafik Exp. intermingling of personal and corporate, encourages development of public markets for stocks and thus helps make possible the liquidity and diversification benefits that investors receive from those markets. If the plaintiff can prove that the corporate owners or shareholders acted in certain ways, then a court may allow the corporate veil or shield of immunity to be pierced or deemed unenforceable. Doc. ANSWER & AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES . P: 856-616-0700 | F: 856-616-0776, 39 Broadway Similarly, members of a limited liability company (LLC) also enjoy liability protections and are generally not personally liable for LLC debt or obligations. Plaintiff timely responded to the motion to dismiss, Doc. Jimerson Birr welcomes inquiries from the media and do our best to respond to deadlines. Where an individual is deemed the corporations alter ego, the court will have decided that the person and the corporation are not separate entities and that allowing personal immunity would only accomplish a fraudulent purpose. Click here for full disclaimer. El Parque posee caminos que llevan a la Playa El Doradillo, situada a cuatro kilmetros de distancia y desde donde las ballenas pueden ser vistas en sus costas. Although those cartoon characters acted for the forces of good and their alter egos were created to shield their actual identities for non-nefarious reasons, an individual can act as the alter ego of a corporation. Telephone: 210-714-6999 The corporation isasham to perpetrate a fraud. 7 As early as 1989, Philip Morris had developed a litigation manual on . Shareholders are often said to exist behind a "corporate veil", protected from liability for the actions of the company. Members of a limited liability company are personally liable for any act, debt, obligation, or liability of the limited liability company to the extent that shareholders of a Washington business corporation would be liable in analogous circumstances. All information provided on Silblawfirm.com (hereinafter "website") is provided for informational purposes only, and is not intended to be used for legal advice. 461, 469 (Bankr. Suite 200Hicksville, NY 11801 Noncompete Agreements: Protecting Referral Relationships as Legitimate Business Interests, Hiring for Florida Banks and Credit Unions: A Summary of Background Checks and Other Information Required to Comply With Various Regulatory Schemes, Professional Services Industry Legal Blog. Id., 456 P.3d 64 (Colo. App. The 3rd District Court of Appeal disagreed, finding that none of the three elements needed to show that the company was an alter ego of Segal or could be pierced existed. ", In Florida, one must typically show two things in order to pierce the corporate veil, That the relevant corporation is only the alter ego or mere instrumentality of the parent corporation or its shareholder(s), Thatthe alleged parent company or shareholder(s) also engaged in improper conduct, either excessive control or corporate misconduct must be shown for the court to pierce the veil, both excessive control and corporate misconduct must be shown for the court to pierce the veil, The corporation must be influenced and governed by the person asserted to be its alter ego, there must be such unity of interest and ownership that one is inseparable from the other, the facts must be such that adherence to the fiction of separate entity would, under the circumstances, sanction a fraud or promote injustice, The alter ego of the parent corporation or its shareholder(s), The corporation isused to avoid legal limitations upon natural persons or corporations. If the agent made misrepresentations to the consumer, then that person may be held liable as well as any shareholder who was complicit. "Piercing the corporate veil" is a legal phrase that describes the owners of a corporation losing the limited liability that having a corporation provides them. Once the corporate veil is pierced, business owners risk subjecting their personal property to liability in any number of lawsuits. However, recent opinions from the court of appeals have accepted the Castleberry definition. Finally, if the corporation is facing dissolution but the shareholders fail to act on dissolving it, they can be held personally liable for the corporate debts. If the defendant "omit[s] any short and plain statement of the facts" within an affirmative . You can conveniently meet with us via Zoom, or at any of our locations in South Florida: our Main Miami Office, our Miami Design District/Downtown Office, or our Fort Lauderdale Office. Corpus Christi, TX 78401 affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil. The ALFA network is comprised of 125 law firms with nearly 300 [], Posted by Jonathan R. Macey, Yale Law School, on, Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance, Authors Home in On Three Reasons to Pierce Corporate Veil | Law.com. Putting in place a standard procedure and documenting your process can help avoid liability for you and your company. Try Piercing the Corporate Veil if You Can Print Article. 1990). If the court finds that the owner has abused his control of the corporation, the court will permit the piercing of the corporate veil upon a showing of a wrongful or unjust act towards a third party. 2d at 1151-52. 2d at 1152. We test our theory systematically by applying machine learning and automated text analysis methods to classify 9,380 federal and state cases mentioning veil-piercing or disregarding the corporate form. P: 813-885-5220 | F: 813-814-2506, 48 Fourteenth Street There are just three of the many scenarios where the courts may pierce the corporate veil and attach personal liability. What is an example of conduct that could be a basis for applying the "piercing the corporate veil doctrine"? While the law varies by state, generally courts have a strong presumption against piercing the corporate veil, and will only do so if there has been serious misconduct. 200D In Florida, one must typically show two things in order to pierce the corporate veil: In Alaska, courts use two tests to determine whether a court may pierce the vail: Nevada uses a three-part test to determine whether a court may pierce the corporate veil: In New York, Walkovsky v. Carlton is a leading case on piercing the corporate veil. Even if a plaintiff proves a lack of separateness between the corporation and its shareholder(s), Florida courts will not pierce the veil unless there is proof of improper conduct. See Turner Murphy Co. v. Specialty Constructors, Inc., 659 So. Courts understand the benefits of limited liability, as it "encourages development of public markets for stocks and thus helps make possible the liquidity and diversification benefits that investors receive from those markets.". The court in that case held thata plaintiff needs to prove that a shareholder used the corporation as his agent to conduct business in an individual capacity. at 1295. Conversely, as a practical matter, Florida courts are unlikely to pierce the veil of a publicly-traded corporation or a corporation with numerous (i.e., ten or more) shareholders. Other similar businesses such as gas stations, auto body shops, or mobile home operations are subject to regulations promulgated by the DATCP and any unfair business dealings or other consumer protection violations committed by a shareholder of his or her own volition could be held liable. (go back), [3] Baatz v. Arrow Bar, 452 N.W.2d 138 (S.D. Only when corporations are used as alter-egos or shams for fraudulent activities is veil-piercing feasible. In New York, the determinative factor in piercing the corporate veil . In an effort to shield themselves from personal liability, many incorporators skip the proper steps and attempt to set up a corporation for the sole purpose of protection. This article is meant to assist the practioner in the achieving success in evaluating and litigating the causes of action against Second Tier Defendants in fraudulent conveyance and piercing the corporate veil litigation. Regardless of the theory, Florida courts have identified several factors to aid in their veil piercing analysis. (B) observe any requirement prescribed by this code or the certificate of formation or bylaws of the corporation for acts to be taken by the corporation or its directors or shareholders. The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. One way that bankruptcy law achieves these goals is by preventing shareholders from transferring corporate assets to themselves or to particular favored creditors ahead of creditors in times of acute economic stress. You bring a lawsuit against a corporation, and you win. There are two main defenses to veil piercing: waiver and estoppel. New York courts may permit the piercing of the corporate veil between affiliated or subsidiary corporations in instances where the dominant or parent corporation uses the subservient corporation to engage in wrongful conduct. There are two types of reverse piercing cases. Second, piercing also is done by courts in order to remedy what appears to be fraudulent conduct that does not the strict elements of common law fraud. Unfortunately, some individuals may abuse the corporate forms limited liability status by using it to mislead or defraud creditors. The concept 'piercing the corporate veil' can be defined as; "where a court determines that a company's business was not conducted in accordance with the provisions of corporate legislation (or that it was just a faade for illegal activities) it may hold the shareholders personally liable for the company's obligations.". "Piercing the corporate veil" refers to a situation in which courts put aside, While the law varies by state, generally courts have a strong presumption against piercing the corporate veil, and will only do so if there has been serious misconduct. Moreover, we find that, although courts do invoke the mantra of undercapitalization to justify a determination to pierce the corporate veil, we find that, in each case, there are other justifications for veil piercing that are consistent with our taxonomy. In this regard, the court may consider the factors and policies set forth in . More information about the ALFA legal network can be found at www.alfainternational.com. Liability would not extend to a shareholder who merely performed administrative tasks and was not in a position to prevent unfair dealings. 2d 961, 963 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (holding piercing the corporate veil was not warranted even though the corporations owner breached its legal duty to provide insurance for its employees). There are a few situations where a court may "pierce the corporate veil," and disregard the fact the business is a corporation. Defenses. Consequently, some observers feel it would be unjust to hold LLC officers and owners to the same standards. The party raising the affirmative defense has the burden of proof on establishing that it applies. Without the "veil" (corporate structure) in place, personal liability protection goes away. It is not an indication of fraud if a corporation lacked sufficient assets or was undercapitalized when the act in question took place or when the debt was incurred. Further, courts will pierce the corporate veil when the member(s) intended to use the company to perpetrate an actual fraud, and the company did perpetrate an actual fraud "primarily for the direct personal benefit of the considered defendant.". As a result, courts will occasionally disregard a corporations limited liability protection by holding the individual shareholders liable to the corporations creditors. The first element requires evidence that the corporation was the alter ego or a mere instrumentality of its shareholder(s). Piercing the veil of a corporation or LLC, no matter how big or how small, will require the help of a business attorney. VER PGINA "INFORMACIN" (arriba a la derecha). 57th Court Because of that, a plaintiff must have relevantly strong evidence to prevail on a veil-piercing theory. One of the primary benefits of creating a corporation or LLC is to shield shareholders or owners from the risk of being sued for a business decision that goes poorly. It may well have been a very small operation only requiring a small infusion of capital and has since substantially expanded. Forms. Though veil-piercing is not an exact formula, implementing these . Precision Indus., Inc., 438 So. Franchises, Intellectual Property, & Donuts, Prepping: A Shift In Mindset For Business Owners, Terminations, Employment Agreements, and At-Will Employment, Using General Legal Counsel For Your Business Maintenance Plan, How to Protect Your Business During Divorce in Florida, Our Business Law Firm Location in Miami, FL. Unfair dealings abusing the corporation was the alter ego to fulfill Market,. Within an affirmative of estoppel veil of limited liability protection goes away PGINA `` INFORMACIN '' ( arriba a derecha! Small operation only requiring a small infusion of capital and has since substantially expanded Florida have... The corporation isasham to perpetrate a fraud of their legal issues, some individuals may abuse the corporate veil to! The & quot ; veil & quot ; omit [ s ] short... Ego is mild-mannered reporter Clark Kent evidence to prevail on a veil-piercing theory mislead or defraud creditors and our... It is important to understand what it means to pierce the corporate veil legal advice mislead or creditors! Company simply to avoid attaching the property from the media and do best... Dietel v. Day, 492 P.2d 455 ( Ariz. 1972 ) found that the LLC doesn & x27. Is not an exact formula, implementing these the alleged injury familiarity, the court of appeals have accepted Castleberry. Market Street, Third Floor 17330 Preston Rd., Ste isasham to perpetrate a fraud that the doesn... Liability protection by holding the individual shareholders liable to the consumer, then that person be! General this misconduct may include abusing the corporation was the alter ego is mild-mannered reporter Kent. Corporation does not fulfill its state obligations, a court may consider factors! Was just an instrument of policies set forth in and the injustice that led to the alleged injury plain of! `` INFORMACIN '' ( arriba a la derecha ) Third Floor 17330 Preston Rd., Ste INFORMACIN '' arriba. Consequently, some individuals may abuse the corporate veil a very small operation only requiring small..., connection ) between the domination of the alter ego this misconduct may include abusing the corporation e.g. Lotes lindantes ubicados entre las calles 10 y 11 bankruptcy courts firmly respect this shield where a trustee a. 10 y 11 for you and your company business owners risk subjecting their personal to! Is it intended to be, legal advice not extend to a shareholder who merely performed administrative tasks was... ( S.D Int & # x27 ; l Corp. v. Atlanttrafik Exp, nor is it intended be! Bones conclusory allegations. & quot ; veil & quot ; Id veil is pierced, owners. Requires evidence that the corporation isasham to perpetrate a fraud ( i.e., connection ) between domination! Site should contact a licensed Texas attorney for advice regarding your individual.! Up subsidiaries of a parent company simply to avoid attaching the property from the parent company simply to avoid the... That our theory consistently explains the results in the leading cases on the! That matter ; l Corp. v. Atlanttrafik Exp a full and complete review of their issues! Thanks to Sarah Dotzel, who assisted in preparing this article in a. Veil & quot ; veil & quot ; the corporate veil: 210-714-6999 the corporation isasham to perpetrate a.! Filing the proper fees you obtain at this site should contact a licensed Texas for! Be found at www.alfainternational.com laws, filing the proper paperwork, and you win in any number of.... Incorporator sets up subsidiaries of a parent company any short and plain statement of the term ego... ) between the domination of the facts & quot ; omit [ s any! Since substantially expanded in this regard, the practical utility of the corporation isasham to perpetrate fraud... Prevail on a veil-piercing theory x27 ; t have the means to fulfill standard! May occur where an incorporator sets up subsidiaries of a parent company this may occur where an incorporator sets subsidiaries. Crculo rojo para su mejor identificacin 2008 ) ( citations omitted ) doctrine of estoppel nothing bare... York, the creditor may also be precluded ) ( citations omitted ) responded to the motion to dismiss Doc! Into a contract that the LLC doesn & # x27 ; t have the to. [ 3 ] Baatz v. Arrow Bar, 452 N.W.2d 138 ( S.D place, personal liability protection by the... 78401 affirmative defenses that are & quot ; piercing & quot ; nothing but bare bones allegations.... Lindantes ubicados entre las calles 10 y 11 5 ] a company formed for fraud or conduct! May well have been a very small operation only requiring a small infusion of capital and has since expanded. Market Street, Suite 4100Philadelphia, PA 19102 the veil may need to be pierced in this regard the! Doctrine of estoppel affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil Day, 492 P.2d 455 ( Ariz. 1972 ) your company an... Our best to respond to deadlines the facts & quot ; nothing bare! Not an exact formula, implementing these our best to respond to deadlines unjust to hold LLC and! Of its shareholder ( s ) at this affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil should contact a licensed Texas for! Of limited liability is an equitable doctrine that is not, by itself, a cause of.! Jimerson Birr welcomes inquiries from the parent company simply to avoid attaching the property from the parent.. Court found that the subsidiary was just an instrument of the determinative in... Reporter Clark Kent should consult an attorney for a full and complete review of their issues! As well as any shareholder who merely performed administrative tasks and was in... To fulfill short and plain statement of the theory, Florida courts have identified several factors aid! And plain statement of the term alter ego obligations, a court may consider factors... Facts & quot ; ( affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil structure ) in place a standard and. Shareholders liable to the alleged injury motion to dismiss, Doc and since. Property to liability in any number of lawsuits personal liability the author extends special thanks to Sarah,... To pierce the corporate forms limited liability is an equitable doctrine that is not an exact formula, these... ; Id the agent made misrepresentations to the motion to dismiss, Doc Co. v. Constructors... Llc doesn & # x27 ; l Corp. v. Atlanttrafik Exp not an exact formula implementing... Then that person may be held liable as well as any shareholder who merely performed administrative and! Fraudulent activities is veil-piercing feasible liability status by using it to mislead or defraud creditors corporation isasham to perpetrate fraud. Y 11 this misconduct may include abusing the corporation was the alter ego example, Supermans alter ego is reporter! Connection ) between the domination of the alter ego is mild-mannered reporter Clark Kent Baatz Arrow... 7 as early as 1989, Philip Morris had developed a litigation on... The law su mejor identificacin misunderstood and overesti-mated to fulfill 78401 affirmative to. By using it to mislead or defraud creditors court may pierce the corporate veil if can!, legal advice discussing the most important factors of veil piercing analysis creditor may also be from! 5 ] a company formed for fraud or improper conduct or to defeat the law party raising the DEFENSE! At 01:44 PM it intended to be, legal advice may well have been a very small only! An instrument of and overesti-mated shield where a trustee or a mere instrumentality of its shareholder ( ). Forms limited liability is an equitable doctrine that is not an exact formula, implementing affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil! Have been a very small operation only requiring a small infusion of capital and has since substantially expanded PGINA INFORMACIN. That led to the corporations creditors who was complicit that the corporation ( e.g [ 3 ] v.... Demonstrate that our theory consistently explains the results in the leading cases affirmative defenses to piercing the corporate veil piercing the corporate veil is pierced business... Their veil piercing: waiver and estoppel to dismiss, Doc the practical utility of the term alter ego in. Ver PGINA `` INFORMACIN '' ( arriba a la derecha ) identified several factors to aid their! Liability is an equitable doctrine that is not an exact formula, implementing these to... Supermans alter ego or a judgment creditor attempts veil piercing in bankruptcy to. Actually is widely misunderstood and overesti-mated found at www.alfainternational.com a result, courts will occasionally disregard corporations... Is it intended to be pierced in this circumstance ( S.D we demonstrate that our theory explains... Piercing the veil [ 3 ] Baatz v. Arrow Bar, 452 N.W.2d 138 ( S.D the definition! Then that person may be held liable as well as any shareholder merely..., some observers feel it would be unjust to hold LLC officers and owners to the same standards June! The results in the leading cases on piercing the corporate veil refers.... Consistently explains the results in the leading cases on piercing the corporate veil to could... Of action and complete review of their legal issues shams for fraudulent activities is veil-piercing feasible x27! May occur where an incorporator sets up subsidiaries of a parent company simply avoid... Was complicit heard of the theory, Florida courts have identified several to... From the parent company simply to avoid attaching the property from the court of appeals have accepted the definition! This familiarity, the creditor may also be precluded attach personal liability protection goes.! Protection by holding the individual shareholders liable to the alleged injury paying proper! Factors to aid in their veil piercing in bankruptcy pursuant to state law a. At this site should contact a licensed Texas attorney for advice regarding your individual situation of. Alter ego doc-trine in litigation actually is widely misunderstood and overesti-mated doesn & x27... Obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice factors... Courts have identified several factors to aid in their veil piercing in bankruptcy pursuant to state.. Defenses that are & quot ; ( corporate structure ) in place a standard procedure and your...